Conclusion: Six lessons from six technologies

The technologies we’ve delved into over the past six months are in many ways very different, yet some recurrent themes emerged as we put together the technology briefings.

First, there is noticeable overlap in the useful properties and characteristics of these technologies. Porosity and large surface area are key features of biochar, MOFs, and aerogels, while tuneability is a selling point for both MOFs and perovskites. Aerogels and mycelium are both virtuously insulating, while biochar, radiative cooling films, mycelium-based composites, and aerogels have all been made from waste materials.

Perhaps more usefully, however, there were also symmetries in some of the challenges innovators in these areas are facing.

Below we’ve attempted to articulate six broadly applicable lessons from our conversations with experts in these fields.

1. Technologies that do sustainable things need to themselves be sustainable

One of the things that struck the Springwise team is that there was no complacency among the innovators we spoke to about the potential negative environmental impact of these technologies – even if they inherently help us to tackle sustainability issues.

Whether it’s developing recycling methods for aerogels, avoiding the use of ‘forever chemicals’ in radiative cooling paints, or finding lead alternatives in perovskite manufacturing, a lot of work (by both startups and academics) is going into ensuring that these supposedly sustainable technologies are made and handled in a sustainable way.

2. Continuous manufacturing trumps batch-based processes

Mycelium products, aerogels, and MOFs are very different materials, but they share at least one thing in common: innovators are attempting to create them in continuous processes rather than discrete batches.

Batch-based manufacturing typically comes with challenges related to scalability, product consistency, and cost. And just as the pharmaceutical industry has become more interested in continuous manufacturing in recent years, innovators working with these technologies are betting that the path to commercialisation lies in continuous production systems designed to overcome the bottlenecks of batch processing.

3. Machine learning can help us to optimise R&D

The technologies we’ve explored this year all involve some kind of optimisation task that requires balancing different trade-offs to achieve the best outcome. This might be matching a fungal strain to a substrate material or optimising reaction conditions in biochar production.

Thankfully, this type of problem is well-suited to machine learning, which could help us to dramatically speed up R&D cycles. In MOFs research, for example, there are existing databases that AI could be applied to in order to predict MOF structures and synthesis conditions.

4. New technologies require new logistics

Solutions based on circular principles are dependent not only on breakthroughs in chemistry, materials science, or applied biology, but also on logistics networks. A case in point is biochar, where production and distribution must be carefully balanced.

Biochar producers need to tap into waste streams that are both regular and consistent to secure their feedstock. At the same time, they also need consistent demand for their end-product from customers who can be reached economically. Because of this, the optimal siting of biochar production facilities – between feedstock providers and customers – is a delicate balancing act, but one that is vital for minimising costs and transport emissions.

This kind of challenge is not unique to biochar, however. For example, mycelium innovators that work with waste streams face similar challenges with securing feedstocks that have at least a baseline level of consistency, for example.

5. Using existing infrastructure is preferable where possible

Many innovations aspire to be ‘drop-in’ solutions, and this is no less true for the technologies we looked into.

In perovskites, the most mature short-term use case, tandem solar cells, involves applying perovskite materials to standard silicon panels within established processes and using standard equipment. In mycelium, meanwhile, there are opportunities to repurpose bioreactors and other infrastructure originally built for different use cases. Startups are also integrating biochar-based additives into construction materials directly at existing concrete plants or even building sites.

6. Standards and certifications can be a barrier without collaboration

To be implemented in the real world, emerging technologies must (rightly) meet the same standards for quality and safety as existing solutions. For example, you typically cannot add radiative cooling to a building unless the coating meets established certifications. This is just as true for mycelium or biochar-based building materials.

Second, when solutions are at the very cutting-edge of academic science, gaps often remain in our fundamental understanding of the technology. With MOFs, for example, researchers are still grappling with key questions about how they will interact with real-world environments and what impact this will have – both on the performance of the material and the safety of wider eco-systems.

To scale these technologies safely and effectively, it’s therefore crucial that industry, academia, and policymakers work together to establish robust standards and frameworks that balance the urgency of scaling these solutions to solve our most pressing challenges with the need to protect people and nature.

Beyond these six lessons, a final takeaway is how much these technologies have the potential to complement each other. It's not implausible to imagine a future building made from biochar-infused concrete that is insulated with mycelium panels or aerogels, with a facade covered in super-efficient perovskite solar cells coated with a radiative cooling film. Excess energy from these cells could feed into a solid-state battery (also covered in cooling film) with a MOF electrolyte and biochar-based cathodes. The individual battery cells could then be insulated with an aerogel to reduce the risk of your futuristic building going up in flames.

This report summarises the findings of our technology briefing series, which is available exclusively to Springwise members. To delve into more detail on these topics, with insights from industry experts, book a demo or start a free trial today.

Special thanks for the 2025 technology briefing series go to:

  • Dr Andreas Kafizas, Associate Professor, Imperial College London
  • Dr Ernesto Scoppola, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces
  • Assistant Professor Fabian Eisenreich, Eindhoven University of Technology
  • Joanne Rodriguez, Founder and CEO, Mycocycle
  • Lars Dittrich, Dissemination and Knowledge Valorisation Consultant, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
  • Dr Laura Miranda, Chief Communications & Sustainability Officer, Oxford PV
  • Dr Marc Fricke, CEO and co-Founder, aerogel-it
  • Dr Maria Pimenta-Ocampo, Knowledge Exchange Associate, Aston University
  • Dr Mario Schmitt, Co-CEO and Co-founder, ecoLocked
  • Max Nijman, Co-Founder and CTO, MycoFarming
  • Dr Mehreen Gul, Associate Professor, Heriot-Watt University
  • Dr Mojtaba Abdi-Jalebi, Associate Professor, University College London
  • Dr Oliver Higbee, Head of Application Engineering, AssetCool
  • Professor Osman M. Bakr, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)
  • Dr Sam Cryer, Co-Founder and CEO, Thermulon
  • Sandra Go, CEO and Co-Founder, Emmisiv
  • Dr Selina Ambrose, Product Manager, Promethean Particles
  • Sofía Farías, Operations and Programs Coordinator, International Biochar Initiative
  • Susanne Gløersen, Founder and CEO, The Future is Fungi Award
  • Dr Swaroop Chakraborty, University of Birmingham
  • Valeria Araico, Operations and Programs Senior Manager, International Biochar Initiative
  • Professor Željko Tomović, Eindhoven University of Technology